Will Government Bonds Blow Up? What the 2026 Sell-Off Means for Your Bond Fund
From January to October 2026, real yields drove 92% of the 10-year Treasury's rise. France is where the debt math bites. What the sell-off means for your bonds.
Market levels are closing figures from October 7 to 9, 2026, from the US Treasury, the New York Fed, the Banque de France, the Bundesbank, Japan’s Ministry of Finance and the Bank of England. Fund returns are year to date through October 9. The arithmetic changes far more slowly than the levels.
The Economist’s October 10 cover asks “Will bonds blow up?” and answers that a government-debt crisis is looming.1 The facts behind the headline are real. The ten-year Treasury closed at 5.31% on October 5, its highest in more than 20 years. Japan’s ten-year closed above 3% on September 2 for the first time since 1996. France recently paid more than 1.5 points over Germany to borrow for ten years, the widest gap since 2011 by The Economist’s measure.234
For an American with a bond fund, the question is which of these risks reaches the bonds you own. Splitting the US sell-off into its parts gives a less alarming answer for Treasuries than the cover does. Rolling France’s actual bonds forward shows where the debt arithmetic does bite, and how slowly.
What moved between January and October 2026
| Yield | Jan 2, 2026 | Oct 9, 2026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| US 3-month bill | 3.65% | 4.25% | +0.60 |
| US 2-year | 3.47% | 4.80% | +1.33 |
| US 10-year | 4.19% | 5.24% | +1.05 |
| US 30-year | 4.86% | 5.60% | +0.74 |
| US 10-year TIPS (real yield) | 1.94% | 2.91% | +0.97 |
| US 10-year breakeven (nominal minus TIPS) | 2.25% | 2.33% | +0.08 |
| France 10-year OAT | 4.80% | ||
| Germany 10-year Bund | 3.50% | ||
| Japan 10-year JGB (Oct 8) | 3.09% | ||
| UK 10-year gilt (Oct 7) | 5.39% |
Sources: US Treasury daily par and real yield curves; Banque de France constant-maturity OAT index; Bundesbank yield-curve estimate; Japan Ministry of Finance; Bank of England par yield. The France and Germany figures come from different methods, so their 1.29-point gap on October 9 is approximate.356748
On the Banque de France and Bundesbank series, the French spread over Germany peaked at 1.44 points on October 2 and had narrowed to about 1.3 by October 9. The US move was concentrated in one line of the table: the TIPS real yield.
Real yields drove most of the US rise
A ten-year Treasury yield can be split two ways. The first split uses market prices only: the nominal yield equals the TIPS real yield plus the breakeven inflation rate. Between January 2 and October 9, the nominal ten-year rose 1.05 points. The real yield rose 0.97 of that, about 92%. The breakeven rose 0.08. The five- and twenty-year maturities show the same pattern, with real yields carrying 93% to 95% of the move.5
The leader says bond investors “perceive the growing danger that governments will use inflation to pick their pockets.”1 If American investors were bracing for the Fed to tolerate inflation to ease the debt burden, the breakeven is where it would show. It rose eight hundredths of a point in nine months, to 2.33%. A breakeven is an imperfect gauge, since it also carries an inflation risk premium and a discount for TIPS liquidity, but a debasement scare that leaves it almost flat would be unusual.
The second split is model-based: expected future short-term rates plus a term premium, the extra yield investors demand for locking up money for ten years. The two most-cited models disagree on the size of the term premium’s rise. The New York Fed’s Adrian-Crump-Moench estimate went from 0.79% to 0.92%, up 0.13 point. The Fed Board’s Kim-Wright estimate went from 0.58% to 1.08% through October 2, up 0.50 point. The Economist’s briefing describes US term-premium estimates as having barely moved, which matches the first model.2910 On either model, at least half of the ten-year’s rise came from higher expected policy rates, which fits the rest of the evidence. The two-year yield rose 1.33 points. The Federal Reserve raised its target range by a quarter point on September 16, to 3.75% to 4.00%, on a 12 to 0 vote.11 US growth has been strong enough that The Economist’s leader calls some of the sell-off good news.1
The dollar points the same way. When investors lose confidence in a government’s finances, they tend to sell its bonds and its currency together, so yields rise while the currency falls. Since early September the dollar has risen as yields rose: the Fed’s broad dollar index gained about 3% from September 9 to October 2, and the euro, $1.17 at the start of the year, was at $1.13.12 These splits are accounting identities and model estimates. They do not prove causes, and a larger fiscal component could be hiding inside the real yield. But the US market data look more like a repricing of growth and Fed policy than a vote on US solvency. The same real-versus-breakeven split since 2021, and what it means for stocks, is in The Ten-Year Rose 392 Basis Points Since 2021; the US term premium and Treasury supply are in How Much of a Ten-Year Treasury Yield Is Risk Compensation?
The debt arithmetic: interest, growth and the primary balance
Whether a government’s debt burden grows depends on three numbers: the interest rate it pays on its debt (r), the growth rate of nominal GDP (g), and its primary balance, which is the budget balance before interest. With debt b measured as a share of GDP and the primary surplus s also as a share of GDP:
b(this year) = b(last year) × (1 + r) / (1 + g) − s
Primary surplus that holds debt/GDP flat: s* = (r − g) / (1 + g) × b
When r is below g, a government can run a small primary deficit and still see its debt ratio fall. That was the case for most rich countries in the 2010s, and it is why Olivier Blanchard’s 2019 presidential address to the American Economic Association argued that public debt might carry low fiscal cost. Blanchard also warned that the condition could reverse and that markets can demand a risk premium suddenly.13 When r is above g, the government needs a primary surplus just to stand still.
The Economist applies the formula to France. Its briefing puts French debt near 120% of GDP and the primary deficit at 2.9%, and calculates that if all of France’s borrowing were refinanced at the five-year yield, stabilizing the debt would require a primary surplus of about 1.8% of GDP, hence the leader’s “belt-tightening of more than 4% of GDP.”2 We get the same order of magnitude. With the five-year OAT at 4.11% on October 9, Maastricht debt of 119.3% of GDP, and nominal growth between 2.0% (the government’s 2026 forecast) and 2.7% (its 2027 forecast), the required surplus is 1.6% to 2.5% of GDP.614
The formula needs the rate France actually pays, though, and that is far lower than the market yield. The face-weighted average coupon on France’s 58 nominal OATs outstanding in October 2026 is 2.14%.15 At that cost and 2.7% growth, the debt ratio would hold steady with a primary deficit of about 0.65% of GDP. So France’s problem today is the size of its primary deficit, more than four times what its current interest bill allows. Higher market yields make that problem grow over the next decade. The government’s own figures say the same thing in budget terms. It puts the overall deficit that would stabilize debt at 2.3% of GDP in 2026, against a forecast deficit of 5.4%.14
Higher yields reach a budget one bond at a time
A government’s interest bill does not jump when market yields do. A bond issued in 2020 at a 0.5% coupon pays 0.5% until it matures. Higher rates reach the budget only as old bonds are repaid and replaced, and as new deficits are financed. How fast that happens depends on the debt’s maturity. France’s negotiable debt was €2.90 trillion on September 30, 2026, with an average remaining life of 8 years and 158 days.16
We rebuilt France’s debt line by line from the Agence France Trésor tables (103 securities) and rolled the nominal part forward ten years. Bonds that mature, plus about €160 billion a year of new net borrowing, are refinanced at a scenario curve; every other bond keeps its coupon. Of the nominal OATs outstanding in October 2026, 82% are still paying their old coupon at the end of 2028 and 55% at the end of 2031.15
Two checks give some confidence in the model. For a permanent one-point rise in rates, it adds €3.1 billion of interest in the first year, €7.7 billion in the second and €19.1 billion in the fifth. The French government’s 2027 budget, which covers all negotiable debt including inflation-linked bonds, estimates €3.4 billion, €8.1 billion and about €19.2 billion.14 And its 2027 interest bill on nominal debt, about €65 billion, plus roughly €8 billion for inflation-linked bonds, lands near the budget’s €74.9 billion State debt charge (€72.9 billion on the budgetary basis).
Read the chart two ways. The Economist’s refinance-everything number describes where France ends up if today’s curve holds, roughly a decade out. It overstates the near-term cash cost: in our model, repricing the whole stock at once gives a 2027 interest bill of about €117 billion on nominal debt, against €65 billion when bonds roll at their actual dates. On the other hand, the lag also locks in today’s cost. With the curve held at October 9 levels, France’s effective rate passes its nominal growth forecast in 2029, in our model. And the budget itself assumes a ten-year yield of 4.2% at the end of 2026 and 4.3% at the end of 2027, below the 4.80% the market set on October 9.14
The United States reprices faster. The average maturity of its marketable debt was 70 months in July, and bills were 22% of it.17 The average interest rate on that debt was 3.52% at the end of September, up from 3.36% at the end of 2025 and well below the 5.24% ten-year yield.18 Net interest cost the federal government $1,143 billion in fiscal 2026, more than the $916 billion spent on the military.19
Why France, the US and Japan face different risks
A government that borrows in its own currency and has its own central bank can always make nominal payments. Its risks run through inflation, a weaker currency, or interest costs crowding out other spending. The United States, Japan and Britain are in this group. That is no free pass for holders of their bonds, who can lose purchasing power or take price losses, but outright default on Treasury debt would be a political choice rather than a financing constraint.
France borrows in euros, and the European Central Bank sets monetary policy for the whole euro area. That makes French bonds carry credit risk in a way Treasuries do not, which is why the spread over Germany is the number to watch. The euro area has two backstops, and both come with conditions:
- Transmission Protection Instrument (TPI, 2022). The ECB can buy a country’s bonds to counter “unwarranted, disorderly market dynamics.” Eligibility weighs four criteria: compliance with the EU fiscal framework (which includes not being found to have failed to take effective action under an excessive deficit procedure), the absence of severe macroeconomic imbalances, a sustainable debt path, and sound policies. The ECB keeps discretion over all of it.20
- Outright Monetary Transactions (OMT, 2012). Unlimited purchases, but only for a country in a European Stability Mechanism program with “strict and effective conditionality.”21
France has been in the EU’s excessive deficit procedure since 2024. On June 3, 2026 the European Commission found that it had taken effective action, so the procedure stays open with a 2029 deadline and no further steps for now.22 The IMF’s July review found France’s banking sector resilient and projected general government debt rising from 115.7% of GDP in 2025 to 121.1% in 2028.23 The leader’s view that a populist president would win a game of chicken with the ECB is a political judgment. The legal texts put conditions in the way; how firmly the ECB would enforce them under pressure is unknown.
Japan shows the other side of the same arithmetic. Its ten-year yield was 3.09% on October 8, and its thirty-year closed at a record 4.17% on October 6.4 But inflation has raised nominal GDP, real rates remain low, and the deficit is small, so the leader reports Japan’s debt shrinking as a share of the economy for now.1 The IMF projects its net debt at 134% of GDP for 2026.24
Britain’s 2022 gilt crisis is the case that most resembles a bond market blowing up, and borrowed money inside pension funds caused it. A sharp rise in long gilt yields triggered collateral calls at pension funds running leveraged liability-driven strategies, which sold gilts to raise cash, which pushed yields higher. The Bank of England described a “vicious spiral of collateral calls and forced gilt sales” and intervened to restore market functioning.25 The UK government never missed a payment. The losses landed on leveraged holders and on anyone who had to sell. The century-bond version of that story is in Austria’s 100-Year Bond.
Can governments inflate the debt away?
President Trump said in a TIME interview published October 1, as reported by Fortune, that “certain levels of inflation, will also pay off that debt very rapidly.”26 History offers a version of this. Carmen Reinhart and Belen Sbrancia found that from 1945 to 1980, real interest rates in advanced economies were negative about half the time, and that this “liquidation effect” cut debt by roughly 3% to 4% of GDP a year in the United States and Britain.27 It worked alongside interest-rate caps, capital controls and rules that made banks and pension funds hold government bonds.
Without those controls, only unexpected inflation erodes debt, and only debt already issued at fixed rates. Investors who expect inflation demand it in new yields, and with a 70-month average maturity and a fifth of the debt in bills, the US would pay those higher yields on much of its debt within a few years. The cost of a surprise lands on holders of long nominal bonds. For a bond investor the hedge already exists: TIPS principal rises with the CPI, and the ten-year TIPS paid a 2.91% real yield on October 9.5 Whether to lock in that yield is covered in Is Locking In Today’s TIPS Yields Market Timing?
Where the bear case is right
- The US trajectory. The Congressional Budget Office’s February baseline has debt held by the public rising from 101% of GDP in 2026 to 120% in 2036, and net interest from 3.3% to 4.6% of GDP.28 The fiscal 2026 deficit came in at $1,993 billion.19
- A maturity wall. The OECD reports a record $61 trillion of sovereign bonds outstanding across its members in 2025, with one-third of fixed-rate debt maturing between 2026 and 2028. It also reports that markets have “smoothly absorbed the record volumes of supply” so far.29
- French politics. The 2027 budget targets a 5.0% deficit after 5.4% this year, and parliament is struggling to pass even those cuts.1 Marine Le Pen, leading polls for the 2027 presidential election, promised on October 6 a deficit below 3% of GDP by 2030 and €140 billion of savings by 2032.3031
- A term premium that may be rising. The Kim-Wright estimate’s 0.50-point rise this year is large, and a term premium is where fiscal worry would show up in a country that cannot default on its own currency.10
- AI investment competing for capital. A June 2026 NBER paper by Jessica and Jonathan Wachter calibrates a model to observed technology investment and finds that the expected AI transition raises the risk-free rate by about half a point, under a risk aversion of 3 and an elasticity of intertemporal substitution of 1.32 That is a model result under stated preferences rather than a measured effect. The financing side of the AI argument is in Will the AI Boom Push Up Mortgage Rates?
What the sell-off means for a US bond investor
For a Treasury or total bond market fund, the risk that showed up this year is interest-rate risk. Through October 9, Vanguard’s Total Bond Market ETF (BND) returned −2.33% for the year, its intermediate-term Treasury ETF (VGIT) −2.63%, and its long-term Treasury ETF (VGLT), with a duration of 13.5 years, −7.04%.33 That is a bad year for long bonds and a mild one for the rest; BND lost 13.15% in 2022.
The same sell-off raised what bonds pay from here. BND’s 30-day SEC yield was 5.14% on October 8. Martin Leibowitz, Anthony Bova and Stanley Kogelman showed that a bond fund that holds its duration steady earns close to its starting yield over a horizon of about twice its duration minus one year, because higher reinvestment rates make up for the price loss from a rate rise.34 For BND’s 5.7-year duration, that is about ten years. The result assumes high-quality bonds; Martin Fridson and Xiaoyi Xu found it does not hold for high-yield funds.35
To see the trade-off for your own holdings, set the calculator below to your fund’s yield and duration (about 5.1% and 6 years for BND), then add a further rate shock and compare the result with rolling T-bills over your horizon.
Five practical points follow from the evidence:
- Match duration to when you need the money. Cash for the next year or two belongs in T-bills or a money market fund, where a rate rise raises your income instead of cutting your balance. Money for ten years out can sit in an intermediate or total bond fund.
- Use TIPS for spending that must keep up with inflation. They hedge the inflate-the-debt-away channel directly. The ladder approach is in How to Build a TIPS Ladder.
- Rebalance on your normal schedule. Bond prices already reflect what is known about deficits. Selling after a sell-off gives up the higher yield the fund now offers. Why trading on macro calls rarely pays is in Why Macroeconomic Forecasts Are Not an Investment Strategy.
- Know what your international bond fund holds. Vanguard’s Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) had 11.9% in France, 10.8% in Japan, 8.1% in the UK and 7.6% in Italy at the end of August. It hedges currency, which removes exchange-rate swings but leaves the fund exposed to French spreads and foreign rate moves. It returned −0.92% this year through October 9.33
- Hold Treasuries where state tax applies. Treasury interest is exempt from state and local income tax, which adds to their after-tax yield over corporate bonds and CDs in high-tax states.36
Signals that the fiscal worry is taking over
The US data so far point to growth and Fed policy. These readings would point to a fiscal problem instead, and all of them are public:
- Breakevens climbing. A sustained rise in the ten-year breakeven from its 2.33% level would mean investors expect more inflation. The live curve and breakevens are on the Summitward markets page.
- Term premium estimates rising together. The two models disagree this year. Both rising sharply would be clearer.
- Yields up while the dollar falls. That is the pattern of investors leaving a country’s assets. Since early September the dollar has risen with yields.
- Weak Treasury auctions. Auctions that clear well above the pre-auction yield, with dealers left holding more of the issue, signal thin demand. Results are published on TreasuryDirect. The next quarterly refunding is announced November 4.37
Key takeaways
- Real yields drove the US sell-off. From January 2 to October 9, 2026, the ten-year Treasury rose 1.05 points; the TIPS real yield accounted for 0.97 and the breakeven for 0.08.
- France is where the debt arithmetic bites. At the budget’s 2.7% growth forecast, its primary deficit is more than four times what its current interest cost allows, and new borrowing costs well above the 2.14% average coupon on its bonds.
- Higher yields reach budgets slowly. In our model, France’s effective rate climbs from about 2.2% to 4.0% over ten years if the October curve holds, and a permanent one-point rise adds €19 billion of interest by year five.
- Your Treasury fund’s risk is duration and inflation. A long Treasury fund lost 7% this year; a total bond fund lost about 2%, and now yields about 5%.
- Match the bond to the job. Bills for near-term cash, TIPS for real spending, intermediate bonds for diversification, and rebalancing instead of selling on headlines.
Check what your bond sleeve is exposed to
Summitward's portfolio analyzer shows your allocation across stocks, bonds and cash, so you can see how much of your portfolio sits in long-duration bonds before the next rate move.
Open the portfolio analyzerFrequently asked questions
Can the United States default on its debt?
The Treasury borrows in dollars, which the Federal Reserve issues, so it is never forced to miss a payment for lack of money. A default would take a political failure such as a debt-ceiling breach. The realistic risks to a Treasury holder are inflation and price losses when rates rise.
Should I sell my bond fund because of government debt?
Not on this evidence. The 2026 US sell-off was mostly higher real yields and expected Fed policy, and a fund that keeps its duration steady tends to earn close to its starting yield over about twice its duration minus a year. Change your bond allocation when your spending horizon or risk tolerance changes.
Is a 5% Treasury yield a good deal?
It is the highest ten-year yield in about 20 years, and with the ten-year breakeven at 2.33% it implies a real return near 2.9% if inflation matches expectations. The ten-year TIPS locks in 2.91% real directly. Whether that beats stocks for you depends on your horizon and how much volatility you can carry.
Could the ECB bail out France?
The ECB’s TPI lets it buy a country’s bonds to stop disorderly markets, but eligibility weighs fiscal compliance and debt sustainability, and the ECB keeps discretion. OMT purchases require a European Stability Mechanism program with conditions attached. France is under an excessive deficit procedure that the Commission judged on track in June 2026.
Do TIPS protect against governments inflating away their debt?
Yes, for inflation measured by the CPI-U. TIPS principal is indexed to the CPI, so unexpected inflation that erodes nominal bonds raises TIPS principal instead. A TIPS fund can still lose value when real yields rise, as they did by almost a point this year; individual TIPS held to maturity avoid that price risk.
Related guides
- The Ten-Year Rose 392 Basis Points Since 2021. The Real Yield Rose 395.: the same real-yield split over five years, and what it does to the return stocks must beat.
- How Much of a Ten-Year Treasury Yield Is Risk Compensation?: the US term premium, deficits and who absorbs the duration.
- Are Bonds Still Good Diversifiers?: when bonds offset stock losses and when they fall together.
- Is Locking In Today’s TIPS Yields Market Timing?: what a 2.9% real yield buys a retiree.
- Does the Fed Really Set Interest Rates?: how the policy rate reaches the ten-year.
- The Four Deep Risks of Investing: inflation, deflation, confiscation and devastation, and which assets hedge each.
Sources
- The Economist, “Will bonds blow up?” (leader, October 8, 2026). economist.com
- The Economist, “The countries most threatened by turbulent bond markets” (briefing, October 8, 2026). economist.com
- US Department of the Treasury, Daily Treasury Par Yield Curve Rates; January 2, October 5 and October 9, 2026. home.treasury.gov
- Ministry of Finance Japan, JGB interest rates (historical and current); 3.006% on September 2, 2026, 3.06% on September 6, 1996, 3.089% on October 8, 2026; thirty-year record close of 4.168% on October 6, 2026. mof.go.jp
- US Department of the Treasury, Daily Treasury Par Real Yield Curve Rates; January 2 and October 9, 2026. home.treasury.gov
- Banque de France, Webstat, constant-maturity OAT yields (TEC 1, 2, 5, 10, 30), October 9, 2026. webstat.banque-france.fr
- Deutsche Bundesbank, yields on German federal securities, ten-year residual maturity (yield-curve estimate), October 9, 2026. bundesbank.de
- Bank of England, Statistical Interactive Database, ten-year nominal par yield (IUDMNPY), October 7, 2026. bankofengland.co.uk
- Federal Reserve Bank of New York, ACM term premia, ten-year (ACMTP10), January 2 and October 8, 2026; method in Adrian, Crump and Moench, “Pricing the Term Structure with Linear Regressions,” Journal of Financial Economics 110(1), 2013. newyorkfed.org
- Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Kim-Wright three-factor term premium, ten-year (FRED series THREEFYTP10), January 2 and October 2, 2026. fred.stlouisfed.org
- Federal Reserve, FOMC statement (September 16, 2026). federalreserve.gov
- Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Nominal Broad US Dollar Index (FRED DTWEXBGS) and US/euro exchange rate (DEXUSEU), January 2 to October 2, 2026. fred.stlouisfed.org
- Olivier Blanchard, “Public Debt and Low Interest Rates,” American Economic Review 109(4): 1197–1229 (2019). aeaweb.org
- Direction générale du Trésor and Agence France Trésor, “Rapport sur la dette des administrations publiques,” annex to the 2027 finance bill (October 2026): Table 1 debt ratio, nominal growth and debt-stabilizing balance; rate assumptions; sensitivity of the debt charge to a 100bp shock; State debt charge. tresor.economie.gouv.fr
- Summitward calculation from Agence France Trésor detailed outstanding debt by line (OAT, OATi, OAT€i, BTF), read October 11, 2026. Script, data and assumptions: summitward-research; source tables at aft.gouv.fr
- Agence France Trésor, key figures: negotiable debt of €2,896 billion and average life of 8 years 158 days at September 30, 2026. aft.gouv.fr
- US Department of the Treasury, Presentation to the Treasury Borrowing Advisory Committee, Q3 2026: weighted average maturity 70.0 months and bills 22.2% of marketable debt at July 31, 2026. home.treasury.gov
- US Treasury, Fiscal Data, Average Interest Rates on US Treasury Securities; total marketable, December 31, 2025 and September 30, 2026. fiscaldata.treasury.gov
- Congressional Budget Office, Monthly Budget Review: September 2026 (October 8, 2026). cbo.gov
- European Central Bank, “The Transmission Protection Instrument” (press release, July 21, 2022). ecb.europa.eu
- European Central Bank, “Technical features of Outright Monetary Transactions” (press release, September 6, 2012). ecb.europa.eu
- European Commission, excessive deficit procedure: France; and spring package press release IP/26/1140 (June 3, 2026). economy-finance.ec.europa.eu
- International Monetary Fund, “IMF Executive Board Concludes 2026 Article IV Consultation with France” (press release 26/255, July 22, 2026). imf.org
- International Monetary Fund, Fiscal Monitor, April 2026, “Fiscal Policy under Pressure: High Debt, Rising Risks”; general government net debt via the IMF DataMapper. imf.org
- Bank of England, Financial Stability Report, December 2022. bankofengland.co.uk
- Fortune, reporting President Trump’s interview with TIME (October 2, 2026). fortune.com
- Carmen M. Reinhart and M. Belen Sbrancia, “The Liquidation of Government Debt,” NBER Working Paper 16893 (2011). nber.org
- Congressional Budget Office, The Budget and Economic Outlook: 2026 to 2036 (February 2026). cbo.gov
- OECD, Global Debt Report 2026 (March 2026). oecd.org
- Agence France Trésor, “Besoins et ressources de financement de l’État en 2027” (press release, September 29, 2026). aft.gouv.fr
- Euronews, “France government slams Marine Le Pen’s alternative budget” (October 7, 2026), with AFP and AP. euronews.com
- Jessica Wachter and Jonathan Wachter, “What Investment Data Implies about the AI Transition,” NBER Working Paper 35290 (June 2026). nber.org
- Vanguard, fund pages for BND, BNDX, VGIT and VGLT: year-to-date NAV returns through October 9, 2026; 30-day SEC yields at October 8, 2026; duration and BNDX country weights at August 31, 2026; 2022 calendar-year returns. investor.vanguard.com
- Martin L. Leibowitz, Anthony Bova and Stanley Kogelman, “Long-Term Bond Returns under Duration Targeting,” Financial Analysts Journal 70(1): 31–51 (2014). doi.org
- Martin S. Fridson and Xiaoyi Xu, “Duration Targeting: No Magic for High-Yield Investors,” Financial Analysts Journal 70(3): 28–33 (2014). doi.org
- TreasuryDirect, Treasury Notes: “Federal tax due each year on interest earned. No state or local taxes.” treasurydirect.gov
- US Department of the Treasury, Quarterly Refunding Statement (August 2026), announcing the next refunding on November 4, 2026. home.treasury.gov
Author disclosure
Educational content, not investment or tax advice. The France refinancing figures come from a simplified model of the State’s nominal debt under stated assumptions and are not a forecast of the French budget. Bond yields and fund returns change daily.
More in Investing & Portfolio
Browse all investing & portfolio guidesGet new guides by email
Evidence-based, no jargon. At most two emails a month. Unsubscribe any time.
Try it in Summitward
See portfolio factor analysis in action with your own financial data. Free to start, no credit card required.