Umbrella Insurance for High Earners: Why Net Worth Is the Wrong Number
Sizing umbrella coverage to net worth counts a protected 401(k) and ignores wages most states let a creditor garnish for years. What high earners should buy.
The usual advice on personal umbrella insurance is to buy a limit equal to your net worth. It is easy to remember, and it gets the question wrong in both directions. A 401(k) counts toward net worth, yet federal law puts it almost entirely out of a judgment creditor’s reach. Future paychecks count for nothing, yet in most states a creditor can take a share of them for a decade or longer.
For a household whose income is high relative to its savings, the second error is the expensive one. The question to ask is what a judgment above your auto or homeowners limit could actually collect, and what it costs to move that limit up by a few million dollars.
The short version
An umbrella pays liability claims above your auto and home limits. Claims that large are rare, but average auto bodily injury payments grew at double the pace of medical inflation from 2017 to 2022, and the insurers who write umbrellas are raising prices because their claims have outrun premiums. Size the limit to what a creditor could reach: unprotected assets plus several years of garnishable pay. Employer retirement plans are largely protected; home equity, IRAs and wages depend on your state. One insurer’s customers paid $300 to $600 a year for $1 million and $1,000 to $1,800 for $5 million in a six-month window ending January 2026, so for most high earners we would get quotes at $1M, $2M, $3M and $5M and buy. Read the exclusions before the price: business activity, rentals, board service and uninsured-motorist coverage are where policies differ.
What an umbrella pays for
A personal umbrella is liability insurance that sits on top of your auto, homeowners or renters policy. The National Association of Insurance Commissioners describes it as coverage for “liability and legal defense costs that exceed the amount your primary insurance policy will pay,” and in some cases for claims the primary policies do not cover at all. 1 It pays for injuries and damage you cause to other people. It does not pay for your own house, your own car or your own injuries.
The arithmetic of a single claim looks like this, for a hypothetical auto accident with one injured person:
| Layer | Pays |
|---|---|
| Judgment against you | $1,300,000 |
| Auto policy, $250,000 per-person bodily injury limit | $250,000 |
| $1 million umbrella | $1,000,000 |
| You | $50,000 |
Three details change what that table means in practice. First, defense costs. On the standard ISO personal umbrella form, defense is paid in addition to the limit, but the duty to defend ends once the insurer has paid out the limit. 2 Some high-net-worth carriers are more generous; Chubb’s brochure says that in most jurisdictions it places no cap on legal costs for a covered loss, “because these expenses are outside of the liability limit.”3
Second, drop-down coverage. When a claim falls outside every underlying policy but inside the umbrella (a libel claim is the common example), the umbrella can pay from the first dollar above a self-insured retention. Jack Hungelmann, writing for IRMI, notes that umbrella forms “vary dramatically” from one another, unlike auto and homeowners policies, which are “fairly comparable.”4
Third, the underlying limits. Carriers will not attach an umbrella to a state-minimum auto policy. Triple-I says most insurers want at least $250,000 of auto liability and $300,000 of homeowners liability first.5 GEICO requires $300,000/$300,000 or $250,000/$500,000 of auto bodily injury, $100,000 of property damage, and $300,000 of homeowners liability. 6 Some carriers have moved higher: RLI told investors in January 2026 that it had required higher underlying limits in several states, and PURE Programs, a surplus lines excess liability program, requires $500,000 with an option to buy down to $300,000. 7 8 The cost of raising your auto and home limits is part of the price of the umbrella.
Large claims are rare and getting larger
Average auto claims do not make the case for an umbrella. Triple-I, using ISO data, reports that bodily injury liability claims occurred at a rate of 0.80 per 100 insured car-years in 2024, with an average cost of $28,278. 9
| Year | BI liability claims per 100 car-years | Average BI liability claim |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 0.89 | $17,014 |
| 2020 | 0.78 | $20,769 |
| 2022 | 0.70 | $24,681 |
| 2024 | 0.80 | $28,278 |
Source: Triple-I, Facts + Statistics: Auto insurance, from ISO/Verisk fast track data. Averages include loss adjustment expenses and exclude Massachusetts and most no-fault states.
An umbrella exists for the claims far above that average: a fatality, a brain or spinal injury, several injured people in one crash, or a victim with high lost earnings. Gen Re trained a model on its personal umbrella claims and found that brain injuries, fatalities, multiple claimants and attorney representation were among the factors that drove severity. 10 In its own loss experience, Gen Re reported that motor vehicle accidents are the leading cause of personal umbrella claims, and that claims involving pedestrians and cyclists rose from 11.4% of the total for 2011 to 2015 to 19.5% for 2016 through 2019.11
Chubb’s marketing describes a $15.5 million plaintiff demand after a guest dove into the shallow end at a pool party a client’s daughter hosted, and a $10.5 million demand against a client who hit a cyclist while texting, with a $500,000 auto policy underneath. 12 Those figures are plaintiff demands rather than payments, and a company that sells the coverage chose them. They show the size of claim the product is built for.
The trend in severity is also clear. The Insurance Research Council studied more than 7.4 million paid auto injury claims from insurers writing about 43% of the private passenger market. Average bodily injury claim payments rose 7.8% a year from mid-2017 to mid-2022, double the pace of medical care inflation. Across all the injury coverages studied, the share of claimants represented by an attorney rose from 40% to nearly 50%, and the litigation rate went from 10% to 18%. 13
You will also see “nuclear verdict” figures, awards above $10 million, cited in umbrella marketing. Swiss Re’s social inflation research covers commercial liability and states that it excludes private passenger auto, so those figures describe lawsuits against businesses. 14 They are not an estimate of a household’s odds.
Wealthy households often go without the coverage. In a 2023 Chubb survey of 800 people in the U.S. and Canada with at least $500,000 of investable assets, nine in ten were concerned about the size of a potential verdict against them, and 36% said they had excess liability coverage. 15
What a judgment creditor can collect
A judgment is a court order that lets the winner use collection tools. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau lists wage and bank account garnishment and liens on your home among them. 16 Each tool runs into exemptions, and the exemptions decide how much of a balance sheet is really at risk.
Employer retirement plans
ERISA requires covered plans to provide that benefits “may not be assigned or alienated.” 17 The Department of Labor summarizes the rule this way: “ERISA and the Code do not permit a participant to assign or alienate the participant’s interest in a retirement plan to another person,” with a limited exception for qualified domestic relations orders. 18 In Patterson v. Shumate, the Supreme Court held that the same restriction keeps an ERISA-qualified plan out of the bankruptcy estate.19 For an ordinary tort judgment, a 401(k) or 403(b) at a private employer with employees is about as protected as an asset gets. Governmental and church plans, including many 403(b) and 457(b) plans at public hospitals and universities, are outside ERISA’s coverage, so their protection comes from state law. 20
A solo 401(k) is different. A plan that covers only a business owner and spouse is not an ERISA Title I plan, so the anti-alienation rule above does not apply to it, and outside bankruptcy its protection comes from state law. 21
IRAs
In bankruptcy, contributory traditional and Roth IRAs are exempt up to $1,711,975 (the figure in effect since April 1, 2025), and amounts rolled over from employer plans are exempt without that cap.22 Rolling a 401(k) into an IRA gives up ERISA’s protection, so outside bankruptcy the rolled money is only as safe as your state’s IRA exemption. Outside bankruptcy, which is where a judgment creditor usually operates, state law decides. Washington exempts IRAs, Roth IRAs and HSAs from “execution, attachment, garnishment, or seizure by or under any legal process whatever.” 23Texas exempts IRAs and Roth IRAs, including inherited ones, along with employer plans and HSAs. 24 California protects an IRA “only to the extent necessary to provide for the support of the judgment debtor when the judgment debtor retires” and for a spouse and dependents, taking into account the other resources likely to be available, which a court decides case by case. 25 Under the federal bankruptcy exemption, a non-spouse inherited IRA does not count as retirement funds26; some states, Texas among them, protect it by statute.
Home equity
Homestead exemptions run from almost nothing to unlimited. Florida and Texas cap the homestead by acreage rather than dollar value. 2728 Washington protects the greater of $125,000 or the county median sale price of a single-family home in the prior year.29 California protects the greater of $300,000 or the countywide median sale price, capped at $600,000, with both figures adjusted for inflation since 2022. 30 In bankruptcy, a federal cap of $214,000 can override a generous state homestead when the debt comes from reckless or intentional conduct that caused serious injury or death. 31
Taxable accounts and cash
Brokerage accounts, savings and checking balances generally have no exemption beyond small state allowances. For most households, these are the first assets a creditor reaches. Some states let married couples hold property as tenants by the entirety, which can shield it from a creditor of only one spouse; which states allow it, and whether it covers financial accounts, varies.
Future wages can be garnished for years
Federal law caps ordinary wage garnishment at the lesser of 25% of weekly disposable earnings or the amount by which those earnings exceed 30 times the federal minimum wage. 32 Disposable earnings are what remains after deductions required by law, such as income and payroll tax withholding; voluntary 401(k) contributions are not subtracted. When a state protects more, the Department of Labor says “the law resulting in the lower amount of earnings being garnished must be observed.” 33
State rules range widely. Texas’s constitution says “no current wages for personal service shall ever be subject to garnishment,” except for child support and spousal maintenance.34 Washington exempts the greater of 75% of disposable earnings or 35 times the federal minimum wage, leaving up to 25% reachable. 35 California caps garnishment at the lesser of 20% of disposable earnings or 40% of the amount above 48 times the minimum hourly wage, so a high earner can lose up to 20%. 36Pennsylvania exempts wages in an employer’s hands except for support, certain residential lease judgments and a few other categories, which leaves out ordinary injury judgments. 37
Judgments also last. California judgments are enforceable for 10 years and can be renewed, and they accrue interest at 10% a year.38 39 Washington allows 10 years plus a 10-year extension. 40 New York presumes a money judgment paid only after 20 years and charges 9% interest on it. 41For a high earner, a judgment above the policy limit can become a claim on a share of every paycheck for a large part of a career.
Bankruptcy is a bad outcome to plan around, and for some judgments it is unavailable. The Supreme Court held in Kawaauhau v. Geiger that debts from negligent or reckless injuries can be discharged.42 A creditor can ask the court to block discharge of a debt for “willful and malicious injury,” and a debt for death or personal injury caused by driving while intoxicated is excluded from discharge automatically. 43 Chapter 13 is closed to anyone with more than $526,700 of unsecured debt. 44 Chapter 7 is often open even to a high earner, because the means test applies only to a debtor whose debts are “primarily consumer debts,” and a judgment for injuring a stranger is hard to fit into the Code’s definition of a debt incurred “primarily for a personal, family, or household purpose.” 45 Filing would end the wage exposure from a negligence judgment, at the cost of nonexempt assets, years of damaged credit and, in some careers, a security clearance or professional license. In Texas and other generous-homestead states, a debt from reckless conduct that caused serious injury can also cap the homestead at $214,000 in bankruptcy. 31 Part of what an umbrella buys is never having to make that choice.
One household in three states
To see how far apart the same balance sheet can land, take one modeled household. A married couple with one earner making $500,000 in wages has a net worth of $500,000: $50,000 in a taxable account and cash, $250,000 of home equity, $150,000 in the earner’s employer 401(k) and $50,000 in a Roth IRA built from annual contributions. The earner causes a car accident, and a court enters a $2 million judgment. The auto policy pays its $250,000 per-person limit. There is no umbrella, so $1.75 million is uncovered.
| Modeled household | Texas | Washington (King County) | California |
|---|---|---|---|
| Taxable and cash, $50,000 | Reachable | Reachable | Reachable |
| Home equity, $250,000 | Protected (no dollar cap) | Protected (exemption tied to a county median near $975,000) | Protected (exemption of at least $300,000 before inflation adjustment) |
| Employer 401(k), $150,000 | Protected | Protected | Protected |
| Roth IRA, $50,000 | Protected | Protected | Only to the extent a court finds it necessary for retirement support |
| Garnishable pay per year | None | Up to 25%, about $93,000 | Up to 20%, about $66,000 |
| Interest on the uncovered $1.75 million | 6.75%, about $118,000 a year | Prime plus 2 points, about $153,000 a year at 8.75% | 10%, $175,000 a year |
| How long it lasts | Kept alive by a new writ at least every 10 years | 10 years plus a 10-year extension | 10 years, renewable |
Pay estimates use 2026 federal brackets and the standard deduction for a married couple filing jointly, Social Security and Medicare tax including the additional Medicare tax withheld above $200,000, California income tax and SDI, and Washington’s long-term care premium; other state payroll premiums are ignored, and garnishment in practice is computed paycheck by paycheck on amounts withheld. King County median from the NWMLS 2025 annual review; a court applies the figure named in the statute. Interest rates are for a judgment entered in September 2026. All three are community property states: in California and Texas, community property is generally liable for a tort either spouse commits during marriage, so the result would be similar if the non-earning spouse caused the crash; Washington applies narrower rules when the wrong was not done for the community. Sources: 34 24 2846 29 47 35 4840 30 25 3639 38 49 5051 52
Under the rule of thumb, this household needs coverage equal to its $500,000 net worth in every state, which in practice means the smallest umbrella sold, $1 million. In Texas, a creditor could collect about $50,000 now plus whatever the household later saves outside exempt accounts. In Washington and California, it could also take a share of pay every year, and because the garnishment is smaller than the interest, the balance would never shrink outside bankruptcy: the household would pay for as long as the judgment is kept alive. For this household, the exposure depends on its income and its state far more than on its net worth.
Why this is the kind of risk insurance is for
Insurance loses money on average for the buyer. Premiums have to cover expected claims plus the insurer’s expenses, commissions, cost of capital and profit, which is why small, predictable losses are better paid out of savings. Kenneth Arrow proved that if an insurer will sell any policy “at a premium which depends only on the policy’s actuarial value, then the policy chosen by a risk-averting buyer will take the form of 100 per cent coverage above a deductible minimum.” 53 Jan Mossin showed that with a loaded premium, full coverage of every loss stops being optimal. 54 The practical reading is to keep a high deductible on losses you can absorb and spend the insurance budget on losses you cannot.
A liability judgment several times your coverage is the second kind. A $1 million layer priced between $300 and $600 a year costs 0.03% to 0.06% of the limit annually. Almost every buyer collects nothing, so in expected-value terms the premium is a loss. What a few hundred dollars a year buys is the removal of an outcome that would change where the household lives, when it retires and how much it can leave its children.
Isaac Ehrlich and Gary Becker separated three responses to a risk: buying market insurance, self-insurance that shrinks the size of a loss, and self-protection that lowers its probability. 55Their result that insurance and self-protection can be complements applies here. A fence around the pool, a rule that new teenage drivers do not carry friends, and a phone left in the glove box lower the odds of the claim that the umbrella pays for.
Most injury claims settle at the policy limit
Plaintiffs rarely collect judgments from personal assets. In a study of Texas medical malpractice closed claims from 1990 to 2003, Zeiler and coauthors found that “policy limits often act as effective caps on recovery” and that personal contributions by physicians were rare. 56 Tom Baker’s interviews with Connecticut personal injury lawyers describe the “moral and practical barriers” to collecting “blood money” from individual defendants. 57 Stephen Gilles traces many uncollectible defendants to the same exemptions described above: garnishment limits, homestead and retirement-plan exemptions, and bankruptcy. 58
Two things follow. Your liability limit often sets the ceiling on what a claim settles for, which is a reason to have a higher one. And the protection runs both ways: virtually every state imposes a duty on insurers to settle reasonably within limits, 59 and an insurer that refuses a reasonable offer inside the limit can be liable for the excess judgment. 60 That protection depends on a settlement demand within your limit, which a higher limit makes more likely.
A common objection is that a large umbrella makes you a target. Limits are not secret once a claim is made; federal court rules require a defendant to disclose any insurance agreement that may pay a judgment, and Florida requires insurers to disclose limits, including umbrella limits, on a claimant’s written request before a suit is filed.61 62 We found no empirical study showing that higher limits increase the chance of being sued, and none showing they do not.
What coverage costs
Published price figures vary more than their sources admit, and several widely repeated averages trace back to data a decade old. The most recent insurer data we found comes from Mercury Insurance, from its customers in select states between August 2025 and January 2026.63
| Umbrella limit | Annual premium, Mercury customers | Premium as % of limit |
|---|---|---|
| $1 million | $300 to $600 | 0.03% to 0.06% |
| $2 million | $600 to $1,000 | 0.03% to 0.05% |
| $5 million | $1,000 to $1,800 | 0.02% to 0.04% |
Consumer Reports put $1 million at $200 to $400 a year in 2023.64 Assured Research, an insurance industry research firm quoted by Gen Re in 2025, called the product “fundamentally underpriced at an average cost of $400–$500 (or so) for $1 million.” 65 In Mercury’s ranges, the cost per million falls as the limit rises, so the step from $2 million to $5 million costs less per million than the first million.
Expect prices to rise. Gen Re, citing Assured Research, puts the U.S. personal umbrella market at $6.6 billion of premium and its 2024 combined ratio around 200%, meaning claims and expenses ran at about twice premiums, with 55 points of that from reserve increases on older years. 65 RLI reported a 12% personal umbrella rate increase in the fourth quarter of 2025 and a California increase of about 20% effective December 1. 7 Carriers are also raising required underlying limits, which adds cost to the auto policy underneath.
Exclusions that matter for high earners
A $5 million policy that excludes your largest exposure protects less than a $2 million policy that covers it. These are the exclusions worth reading line by line.
- Business activity. The ISO form excludes “any business activity performed by any insured,” and treats an activity that earned more than $2,000 in the prior 12 months as a business. 2 Travelers notes its exclusion applies “even if your business is operated out of your home.” 66Consulting, a paid newsletter, and an LLC side business all need commercial coverage.
- Professional services. The ISO form excludes professional services. 2 A physician, attorney, engineer or financial advisor needs malpractice or errors and omissions coverage for work claims; a personal umbrella does not replace it.
- Nonprofit board service. The ISO form excludes directors and officers liability unless the only compensation is expense reimbursement for a nonprofit. 2 Check whether your form includes that exception or offers D&O as an add-on.
- Rentals. The ISO form allows occasional rental of an insured residence. 2 Regular short-term rentals and properties held in an LLC need to be disclosed to the umbrella carrier and accepted in writing, or covered by a commercial policy.
- Boats and recreational vehicles. Umbrellas generally cover watercraft only to the extent of underlying coverage, and length limits between 25 and 75 feet are common. 67 GEICO requires $300,000 of underlying liability on boats 26 feet or longer or with 50 horsepower or more. 6
- Your household. The ISO form excludes injury to a named insured or family member. 2 A lawsuit by a relative who lives with you is outside the umbrella.
- Intentional acts. Travelers says an umbrella “isn’t designed to protect you from liability connected with your own intentionally harmful behavior.” 66
- Defamation and social media. Travelers lists libel, slander, defamation and invasion of privacy as covered, and Chubb includes cases “originating from social networks, websites or blogs.” 66 3 If the publishing earns money, the business exclusion can still apply.
- Household employees. Chubb offers optional employment practices coverage for claims by residential staff.3 Standard forms may not address a nanny’s wrongful termination claim at all.
Hungelmann’s advice is to pick the umbrella form with the fewest gaps first, then place the auto and home policies underneath it with the same carrier. 4
Excess uninsured motorist coverage
Everything above protects other people from you. Uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage protects your family from a driver who cannot pay, and standard umbrella forms leave it out. The ISO umbrella form does not extend uninsured or underinsured motorist coverage unless the policy is amended by endorsement. 2 The Insurance Research Council estimates that in 2023 more than one in seven drivers (15.4%) were uninsured, and one in three (33.4%) were uninsured or underinsured. 68
Some high-net-worth carriers sell it. Chubb offers optional excess uninsured motorist coverage with limits up to $10 million, and PURE Programs offers up to $5 million. 3 8 For a high earner, most of the loss from a serious injury caused by an underinsured driver can be lost income, the same human capital a liability judgment would reach. Ask for a quote on this layer at the same time.
Estimate your own exposure
The worksheet below separates what a creditor could reach from what exemptions protect, then adds the present value of garnishable pay over the years a judgment stays enforceable. You set the exemptions, since they depend on your state. The defaults are a made-up household, and a real court can reach a different answer on any line.
When an umbrella is a weak purchase
- Little is reachable. A household in a state with an unlimited homestead, protected retirement accounts and no wage garnishment, with modest taxable savings, has less to protect. Texas is the clearest example.
- The exposure is a business. A landlord with several LLC-owned properties or a professional with malpractice risk needs commercial liability, professional liability or a commercial umbrella. A personal umbrella excludes most of that.
- Early-career, low assets, few risk factors. A renter without a car, with little saved, has less at stake. The case grows as income, savings, drivers and properties are added.
What we recommend
For households earning well into six figures, with taxable savings, teenage drivers, rental property, a pool or a public profile, we would buy an umbrella and pick the limit from quotes rather than from a rule of thumb.
- Raise the underlying limits first. Get auto and home liability to whatever the umbrella carrier requires, typically $250,000 to $500,000.
- Estimate what a creditor could reach. List taxable accounts and cash, home equity above your state’s homestead exemption, and any IRA or solo 401(k) your state does not protect. Add several years of garnishable pay.
- List the household’s exposures. Drivers and their ages, properties, rentals, boats, dogs, pools, household employees, board seats and paid publishing.
- Get quotes at $1M, $2M, $3M and $5M. The price of each additional million usually falls, so compare the increments, and include excess uninsured motorist coverage.
- Read the exclusions against your list. If a cheaper policy excludes your rental or your board seat, a claim from either one falls entirely on you.
As a decision aid, not a coverage recommendation:
| Few liability exposures | Several liability exposures | |
|---|---|---|
| Modest income, little reachable | Optional | Quote $1M |
| High income, modest savings | Quote $1M to $2M; wages are the exposure | Quote $2M to $5M |
| Large reachable assets | Quote $2M to $5M | Quote $5M and above, with excess UM/UIM |
If the exposure question matters to a decision, such as whether to retitle assets or hold a rental in an LLC, pay for an hour with an attorney licensed in your state. Transfers made to put assets beyond a creditor’s reach can be undone. 69
Frequently asked questions
Should umbrella coverage equal my net worth?
Net worth is a poor guide. It counts ERISA retirement plans that a creditor generally cannot reach, and it ignores future wages that a creditor often can. Start from reachable assets plus several years of garnishable pay, then compare quotes at several limits.
Can a lawsuit take more than I own?
A court can enter a judgment larger than your assets. What happens next depends on collection: in most states a creditor can garnish up to 25% of disposable pay, and judgments can be renewed for decades while accruing interest, unless you discharge the debt in bankruptcy. Most plaintiffs settle within insurance limits instead, which is why the limit you carry matters.
How much does a $1 million umbrella policy cost?
Mercury Insurance reports $300 to $600 a year for its customers between August 2025 and January 2026; Consumer Reports gave $200 to $400 in 2023. Drivers, especially young ones, properties, boats and your state move the price. Add the cost of raising your auto and home liability limits to the carrier’s minimum.
Does an umbrella cover my business or rental properties?
Personal umbrellas exclude business activity and professional services. Occasional rental of your own home is often covered; regular short-term rentals and LLC-owned properties usually need to be scheduled on the policy or covered by a commercial policy. Check the form.
Is my 401(k) safe from a lawsuit?
An ERISA-covered employer plan is protected from most creditors by federal law, with exceptions such as divorce orders. A solo 401(k) covering only you and a spouse is not an ERISA Title I plan, and IRAs outside bankruptcy depend on state law.
Does umbrella insurance cover a drunk-driving accident?
The NAIC lists punitive damages among the things an umbrella will not pay, and uses drunk driving as its example. 1 Read your own form for how it treats the rest of the claim. A judgment for injuries caused while driving intoxicated cannot be discharged in bankruptcy.
Is umbrella insurance tax-deductible?
Premiums for personal liability coverage are a personal expense and are not deductible. 70 Coverage for a rental or business may be a deductible expense of that activity; ask your tax preparer.
Key takeaways
- Size the limit to what a creditor could reach. Reachable assets plus several years of garnishable pay is a better starting point than net worth, which counts protected retirement plans and ignores future wages.
- Exemptions are set by state. The same balance sheet has little reachable in Texas and a share of pay at risk for years in Washington or California.
- Auto injury claims are getting more expensive. The IRC found payments rising 7.8% a year from 2017 to 2022, with more attorney involvement and litigation.
- Coverage is inexpensive relative to the limit. One insurer’s customers paid 0.02% to 0.06% of the limit a year across $1 million to $5 million, though prices are rising.
- The exclusions decide what you bought. Business, professional, rental, board and household-employee exposures are often excluded, and excess uninsured motorist coverage is usually a separate add-on.
Related guides
- Your Portfolio Is Not Just Your Brokerage Account: Human Capital Risk for Tech Workers values future earnings as an asset, the same asset a judgment can garnish.
- Term Life Insurance: How Much You Need, How to Buy It, and What to Avoid applies the same catastrophic-risk logic to the loss of an income.
- Don’t Mix Insurance With Investing: Why Term Life Usually Wins explains why insurance should transfer risk and nothing else.
- Don’t Automatically Roll Over Your Old 401(k) covers the ERISA and state-law creditor protection you keep or give up in a rollover.
- Roth 401(k) as Vault, Roth IRA as Valve compares ERISA and IRA protection in detail, with a Washington example.
- Emergency Fund Sizing: 3, 6, 12, or 24 Months? sizes the losses you insure yourself against.
Sources
- National Association of Insurance Commissioners. “What’s an Umbrella Policy?” December 15, 2022. content.naic.org
- RNC-Pro. “Personal Umbrella Liability Policy Coverage Analysis,” an analysis of ISO Personal Umbrella Liability Policy DL 98 01. Read September 2026. rnc-pro.com
- Chubb. “Personal Excess Liability Insurance” product page and Masterpiece excess liability brochure. Read September 2026. chubb.com
- Hungelmann, J. “In Praise of Personal Umbrella Policies.” IRMI, June 2, 2017 (originally published September 2007). irmi.com
- Insurance Information Institute (Triple-I). “Should I purchase an umbrella liability policy?” Read September 2026. iii.org
- GEICO. “Umbrella Insurance Requirements and Minimum Limits.” August 31, 2026. geico.com
- RLI Corp. Fourth quarter 2025 earnings call, January 22, 2026 (transcript via The Motley Fool). fool.com
- PURE Programs. “PURE Programs Expands Excess Liability Coverage.” Read September 2026. pureprograms.com
- Insurance Information Institute (Triple-I). “Facts + Statistics: Auto insurance,” bodily injury liability frequency and severity, from ISO/Verisk. Read September 2026. iii.org
- Wagner, P. and Sirkar, N. “A Study on Personal Umbrella Loss Drivers.” Gen Re, February 1, 2021. genre.com
- Tuomi, K. “Indications Point to Rising Personal Umbrella Losses – What About Your Book?” Gen Re, October 14, 2019. genre.com
- Chubb. “Personal liability trends: growing litigation risks and costs.” Flyer, 2024. chubb.com
- Insurance Research Council. Auto Injury Insurance Claims: A Study of Increasing Claim Severity. July 2026. insurance-research.org
- Swiss Re Institute. “Litigation costs drive claims inflation: indexing liability loss trends.” sigma No 4/2024. swissre.com
- Chubb. “Chubb Report Offers Insight on Mindset of the Wealthy, Their Passions and Protecting What Matters.” Press release, December 19, 2023. Survey of 800 respondents with at least $500,000 of investable assets, conducted by iResearch Services. news.chubb.com
- Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. “What is a judgment?” May 15, 2024. consumerfinance.gov
- 29 U.S.C. § 1056(d), assignment or alienation of plan benefits. law.cornell.edu
- U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration. QDROs: The Division of Retirement Benefits Through Qualified Domestic Relations Orders, chapter 1. dol.gov
- Patterson v. Shumate, 504 U.S. 753 (1992). law.cornell.edu
- 29 U.S.C. § 1003(b), exclusion of governmental and church plans from ERISA Title I coverage. law.cornell.edu
- 29 C.F.R. § 2510.3-3(b)–(c); Yates v. Hendon, 541 U.S. 1 (2004). ecfr.gov
- Judicial Conference of the United States. “Revision of Certain Dollar Amounts in the Bankruptcy Code,” 90 Fed. Reg. 8941, February 4, 2025, effective April 1, 2025. govinfo.gov
- Revised Code of Washington § 6.15.020, pension money exemptions. app.leg.wa.gov
- Texas Property Code § 42.0021, additional exemption for certain savings plans. tcss.legis.texas.gov
- California Code of Civil Procedure § 704.115, private retirement plans. leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
- Clark v. Rameker, 573 U.S. 122 (2014). law.cornell.edu
- Florida Constitution, Article X, § 4, homestead exemptions. flsenate.gov
- Texas Property Code §§ 41.001–41.002, homestead. tcss.legis.texas.gov
- Revised Code of Washington § 6.13.030, homestead exemption amount. app.leg.wa.gov
- California Code of Civil Procedure § 704.730, homestead exemption amount. leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
- 11 U.S.C. § 522(q), limitation on homestead exemption. law.cornell.edu
- 15 U.S.C. § 1673, restriction on garnishment; § 1672(b), disposable earnings. law.cornell.edu
- U.S. Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division. “Fact Sheet #30: Wage Garnishment Protections of the Consumer Credit Protection Act.” Revised December 2024. dol.gov
- Texas Constitution, Article XVI, § 28, garnishment of wages. tcss.legis.texas.gov
- Revised Code of Washington § 6.27.150, exemption of earnings. app.leg.wa.gov
- California Code of Civil Procedure § 706.050, maximum earnings withholding (operative September 1, 2023); § 706.011, disposable earnings. leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
- 42 Pa.C.S. § 8127, personal earnings exempt from process. palegis.us
- California Code of Civil Procedure §§ 683.020 and 683.110, period for enforcement and renewal. leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
- California Code of Civil Procedure § 685.010, interest on money judgments. leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
- Revised Code of Washington § 6.17.020, execution within ten years and extension. app.leg.wa.gov
- New York Civil Practice Law and Rules § 211(b) (presumption of payment after 20 years) and § 5004 (rate of interest). nysenate.gov
- Kawaauhau v. Geiger, 523 U.S. 57 (1998). law.cornell.edu
- 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6), (a)(9) and (c), exceptions to discharge. law.cornell.edu
- United States Courts. “Chapter 13 – Bankruptcy Basics.” Read September 2026. uscourts.gov
- 11 U.S.C. § 707(b)(1), dismissal for abuse of a case filed by a debtor whose debts are primarily consumer debts; § 101(8), definition of consumer debt. law.cornell.edu
- Texas Finance Code § 304.003, postjudgment interest rate; Texas Office of Consumer Credit Commissioner, interest rates, September 2026. occc.texas.gov
- Northwest Multiple Listing Service. 2025 Annual Statistical Review, January 2026. nwmls.com
- Revised Code of Washington § 4.56.110(3)(b), interest on judgments founded on tortious conduct. app.leg.wa.gov
- Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code § 34.001, no execution on dormant judgment. tcss.legis.texas.gov
- California Family Code § 910, liability of community estate for debts. leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
- Texas Family Code § 3.202, rules of marital property liability. tcss.legis.texas.gov
- deElche v. Jacobsen, 95 Wn.2d 237 (1980). courtlistener.com
- Arrow, K. J. (1963). “Uncertainty and the Welfare Economics of Medical Care.” American Economic Review 53(5), 941–973. Quotation from the appendix, p. 969. assets.aeaweb.org
- Mossin, J. (1968). “Aspects of Rational Insurance Purchasing.” Journal of Political Economy 76(4), 553–568. journals.uchicago.edu
- Ehrlich, I. and Becker, G. S. (1972). “Market Insurance, Self-Insurance, and Self-Protection.” Journal of Political Economy 80(4), 623–648. journals.uchicago.edu
- Zeiler, K., Silver, C., Black, B., Hyman, D. A., and Sage, W. M. (2007). “Physicians’ Insurance Limits and Malpractice Payments: Evidence from Texas Closed Claims, 1990–2003.” Journal of Legal Studies 36(S2), S9–S45. ideas.repec.org
- Baker, T. (2001). “Blood Money, New Money, and the Moral Economy of Tort Law in Action.” Law & Society Review 35(2), 275–319. ideas.repec.org
- Gilles, S. G. (2006). “The Judgment-Proof Society.” Washington and Lee Law Review 63(2), 603. scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu
- Hyman, D. A., Black, B., and Silver, C. (2011). “Settlement at Policy Limits and the Duty to Settle: Evidence from Texas.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 8(1), 48–84. ideas.repec.org
- Crisci v. Security Insurance Co., 66 Cal. 2d 425 (1967). scocal.stanford.edu
- Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1)(A)(iv), initial disclosure of insurance agreements. law.cornell.edu
- Florida Statutes § 627.4137, disclosure of certain information required. flsenate.gov
- Mercury Insurance. “How Much Does Umbrella Insurance Cost?” March 24, 2026. Ranges based on Mercury customers in select states, August 1, 2025 to January 31, 2026. mercuryinsurance.com
- Medintz, S. “Get the Insurance You Need at a Great Price.” Consumer Reports, August 3, 2023. consumerreports.org
- Tuomi, K., with Wilt, W. (Assured Research). “No One Should Ignore Personal Umbrella in 2025.” Gen Re, July 31, 2025, quoting Assured Research’s May 2025 Assured Briefing. genre.com
- Travelers. “Umbrella Insurance.” Read September 2026. travelers.com
- FC&S Editorial Staff. “Aircraft and watercraft exclusion in umbrella forms.” PropertyCasualty360, December 17, 2024. propertycasualty360.com
- Insurance Research Council. Uninsured and Underinsured Motorists: 2017–2023. February 17, 2025. insurance-research.org
- 11 U.S.C. § 548, fraudulent transfers and obligations. law.cornell.edu
- 26 U.S.C. § 262, personal, living, and family expenses. law.cornell.edu
Editor’s note
This guide describes insurance forms and creditor law in general terms. Policy wording varies by carrier and state, and exemption law changes; figures were checked in September 2026. It is not legal or insurance advice. Ask a licensed agent to compare forms and an attorney licensed in your state about what a creditor could reach.
More in Risk & Protection
Browse all risk & protection guidesGet new guides by email
Evidence-based, no jargon. At most two emails a month. Unsubscribe any time.
Try it in Summitward
See FI progress tracking in action with your own financial data. Free to start, no credit card required.